Super Bowl Sunday is the day when people work as hard for their commercials as for the game. A 30-second spot for a commercial will be priced at $7 million this year, up from $6.5million last year.

Anheuser-Busch spent $20 million on advertising this year. This was for just three seconds of TV time. Its advertising budget was 3.5 times higher than that of its rivals. It may be difficult to continue making wise investments in these ads due to changes in demographics, and, most importantly, viewer behavior.

It will be increasingly difficult to reach younger audiences.

According to Gen Z, authenticity, experience and social responsibility are important. These are the factors Budweiser should be considering as it opens up its market for this generation of people,” Yuvay Ferguson (associate professor of marketing at Howard University’s School of Business) said.

The social media element should be included, since the viewers may not all have access to a large-screen TV. Even those in the room could still be using their phones.

Dustin York, an associate professor of communication at Maryville University suggested that advertisers should consider mobile activation strategies for targeting the digital natives Gen Z.

“Gen Z, which is multi-device-generation, will have their phones out during the big-game. So look out for ads to use QR codes and ‘watch it online’ strategies. Use hashtags and other techniques to activate viewers’ cell phones.

It’s not actors, but influencers

The increased popularity of Hollywood stars is another factor that drives up advertising costs. Big-name stars have long been in ads – Charlton Heston was in a 1995 Bud Light commercial while Jerry Seinfeld starred in a Super Man-themed ad in 1998 – but last year, a number of celebrities, including Halle Berry, Scarlett Johansson, and Anna Kendrick, were seen in high-profile spots.

Gen Z will be as impressed as any trusted influencer. These influencers are a crucial part of the Super Bowl promotion mix.

Ferguson said that Gen Z requires a reason for believing that a product worth exploring, and they are more trusting their “closest friends” on social media than actors.

Influencers can be smarter because they are more able to respond in real time.

Consider identifying influential people to host social media promotions live at events such as the Super Bowl. Ferguson explained that live streaming or contests are two examples to help fans feel connected in this brand-inspire experience. Accordingly to this group, ads that highlight interpersonal connections and socializing will get higher ratings.

After Pandemic Events

The Covid-19 lockdowns had an enormous impact on Gen Z. Ads that embrace experiential moments may also be a hit. What worked in the past won’t work tomorrow. Super Bowl ads may be popular, but a campaign that reaches younger audiences should look at deeper avenues.

Ferguson said, “This generation believes that corporations must do right by the greater good in order to attract Gen Z patronage.” This group will love Budweiser’s message about corporate social responsibility.

Devon Rodriguez wasn’t unknown before he joined TikTok, not in the art world anyway. A high school prodigy whose realistic oil paintings of subway passengers caught the attention of sculptor John Ahearn, Rodriguez’s work has appeared in The New Yorker, ArtNet News and The New York Times. But it wasn’t until August 2020, when he started drawing people on the subway, filming their delighted reactions and posting their videos on TikTok, that he felt really famous.

“I’d get this reaction from people like, ‘wow, this is magic,’” Rodriguez says.

Within two days of his initial subway posting, over 400,000 had followed him and more than 25 million people had seen his TikTok videos. He was then offered a sponsorship deal by Cheetos. They paid him $7,000 to design their logo, and to share his video on TikTok. Rodriguez, who was living in his grandmother’s house in the South Bronx, saw the potential and started sharing his work on Instagram and YouTube as well.

Now, Rodriguez posts regularly not only on TikTok, where he’s the platform’s most-followed visual artist, but also on Instagram, YouTube and other platforms. This year, Rodriguez expects to generate more than $1,000,000 in revenues.

Rodriguez’s multi-platform formula is employed by most top-earning creators. Makeup tutors, livestream gamers, fitness models and subway artists all know that if they’re seen on more platforms, they attract more sponsors and views. Meta, Snapchat and TikTok are all competing for the most share of this creator economy that is estimated to generate $100 billion annually. Platforms offer creators bigger and more exciting opportunities to monetize content in their quest for short-form creators’ attention.

This summer, Meta increased its reach when Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta announced new ways that creators can earn on Instagram and Facebook. The update includes expansions of the company’s Facebook Stars, an in-app currency much like TikTok coins that fans can purchase and gift to creators, and Reels Play Bonus program, which compensates creators for direct views on their Reels. The announcement is the latest step in the social media giant’s quest to recruit creators of short-form video content — often, those who focus their attention on TikTok.

In response, creators are seeing these new financial rewards not as incentives to migrate from one platform to another, but instead to join additional platforms like Meta’s Facebook and Instagram. According to social media managers as well as creators, SMEIt is becoming more important for them to share their content on every platform. Many, especially short-form creators, though, say that it’s not yet viable to make a living from in-app monetization alone — on any platform.

“During the pandemic, I kept hearing everyone say that TikTok is the way to go viral,” says Rodriguez, who now has 26.8 million followers on TikTok, 3.7 million followers on Instagram and 2.9 million subscribers on YouTube. “But now I post on all platforms to have a presence on all platforms, for sure.”

Meta’s monetization incentives directed at short-form content creators come alongside TikTok’s rapid growth relative to Meta’s platforms. Weekly use of TikTok among Gen Z youth surpassed that of Instagram last November, according to a Forrester analysis, and Facebook’s user growth rate is slowing as well. These incentives are not limited to Meta and TikTok. YouTube, Snapchat, and Pinterest all offer creator funds. They focus on short-form videos and generate view-based income for creators. These incentives, however small, are a factor in creators’ push to expand to more social media platforms because creators see them as a way to diversify their income streams.

Keith Dorsey, CEO of Young Guns Entertainment, a talent management agency focused on Black creators, says he puts a lot of energy into researching trends in the creator economy — and has subsequently spent time convincing creators to get on more platforms.

“You know a lot of the creators I work with … they get a little big-headed, like I’m already famous on this platform, why? Trust me,” Dorsey says.

Robert Dean III is a content creator under Robiiiworld. He’s a veteran of the content creation industry — he first went viral almost a decade ago with relationship-based comedic sketches on Vine, Twitter’s now-defunct video-sharing site, before building followings on several other platforms. Every day, he gets up before 7 am, records all of his content, then shoots and edits throughout the day. Although his content remains the same as in his earlier days, he is now more flexible with how he edits. He may make longer videos or switch between editing styles depending on current trends.

“I mastered making content to adapt to all the platforms, so now, if I make a piece of content, it’s gotta fit TikTok, Instagram, YouTube and Facebook.”

Creators are increasing their visibility on various platforms. Different platforms automatically fall under different roles.

“The most important things for creators are distribution and money,” says Lauren Schnipper, VP of corporate development at Jellysmack, a company built on the premise of helping creators diversify what social media platforms they use. Jellysmack signed thirty TikTok artists last month through a partnership deal with Meta. The company plans to reuse their content on Facebook, Instagram and YouTube Reels. This company is a graduate of The University of Texas. SME’ America’s Best Startup Employers list and received series C funding from SoftBank last year.

“So what’s great about TikTok? Amazing distribution, some brand deals, but they’re not really monetizing that much,” Schnipper says. “If you’re providing both monetization and distribution to help grow your audiences, creators will come.”

Dean agrees: “I look at TikTok as keeping you relevant, and I look at Instagram as keeping you paid.”

He says SME On Facebook, he typically earns about $1,000 per month and on Instagram, he makes roughly the same. He earns around $200 each month on TikTok where he has more views than the other Meta platforms.

Of the four creators, however, only one spoke. SMEDean is an exception. Dean makes approximately half of his revenue directly from short-form video views: creator funds and Reels bonuses as well as YouTube views. Other half is from brand partnerships. These are deals whereby brands pay creators to create content that promotes products.

Others who create short-form content claim that in-app revenue from creator funds and Stars, Coins is still not a sustainable source of income. For the majority of short-form content creators, brand partnerships provide their main income stream.

Rodriguez is a UTA Talent Agency employee. He claims that he has earned $500,000 in brand deals since 2021. This compares to $33,500 for the TikTok creator fund. The TikTok creator fund rewards creators according to video views. He does not currently earn money from Meta’s counterpart for Instagram and Facebook Reels, the Reels Play Bonus program.

Justine Doiron (a Brooklyn-based food blogger) started on TikTok. Since then, she has expanded her accounts, including her Instagram. A majority of her income comes from brand deals. According to her, the revenue she earns is divided 70-30 among brand partnerships as well as her blog.

“I don’t think [the TikTok creator fund] is a creator-centered system,” Doiron says. “It is a very easy compensation system for them to integrate, so I don’t fault them, and I think it’s a good thing for creators overall, so we can put out really valuable content but not necessarily have to tie a partnership to it. I’m interested to see where Meta goes with this.”

Doiron is currently only part of the Pinterest creator fund but said she would consider joining both TikTok and Meta creator funds if the platforms figured out how to pay creators more in a way that doesn’t require them to be “constant content treadmills.” Doiron is currently recipe testing, filming and editing for 5-6 TikToks and 2-3 Instagram Reels per week, with work days that often extend later into the evening than in her previous job in public relations. Hank Green’s video in which TikTok was criticised for not paying creators is cited by Doiron. TikTok didn’t respond to our request for comment.

It is possible that the economic downturn could affect how creators spend their energy and time. According to The Information, brand deals and advertising revenue are declining, as well as funding for startups in the creator economy. Business Insider published last month that Jellysmack had laid off 8 percent of its employees due to a predicted decrease in advertising revenues.

This means less reliance on brand deals and ads, and possibly more reliance on views, as Charlotte Dobre from YouTube says.

Dobre works with Jellysmack and has more than a million followers on her YouTube account, where she creates comedic content meant to “brighten someone’s spirits.” She says she earns almost all her revenue from in-stream ads, half from YouTube and the other half from Facebook.

While it’s exciting that Meta is adding more opportunities for creators to monetize without ads, she says, those avenues aren’t currently a large part of her business. She will devote more resources for short-form content when those opportunities arise.

Creator funds and bonuses are a positive but temporary solution, Schnipper says, adding that as social media companies search for ways to figure out “something more sustainable” for creators, there’s definitely still an advantage of being on as many platforms as possible no matter what happens.

“I’m very proud of the fact that I have highly diversified social media accounts, so if TikTok goes away, I’m not on the streets, and vice versa for everything else,” Doiron says.

While Meta is facing a drop in earnings in an era of new data privacy features introduced by Apple, TikTok is facing criticism — and a possible FTC investigation — for misrepresenting what it does with user data.

“You never know how long it’s going to last,” Dobre says. “The crappy thing about this business is that you have to strike when the iron is hot.”

Are there any age requirements to use social media?

Many parents don’t believe in allowing their children younger than 13 to have unlimited Internet access. However, a PrivacyHQ.com survey has shown that 63 per cent of parents allow YouTube and 54 percent give their permission for their teens to use Instagram. And 49 percent let their teenagers use TikTok.

A third of 10 parents allowed their children to use social networking before the age 13. This was to help them achieve future goals such as becoming a content creator or professional gamer. A further 64 percent of parents stated that their child wanted to influence others on Instagram and YouTube in the future. However, 81 percent of respondents said they supported this choice.

It may sound glamorous and even an easy job – but we could question whether kids actually understand what is involved in building a following, and that not everyone will have true “influence” in the future?

This comes as many YouTubers and TikTok users have spoken out about the negative stigmas of making a living through these social media platforms. Just 40% of parents reported that they could effectively communicate to their children the differences in real life and how it is presented on social media.

The Dangerous World

Mirela Iancu (Director of User Engagement at PrivacyHQ.com) said that social media exposes younger users to worse content than TV.

“The Internet and social media have a plethora of information that might be sensitive towards children like adult content or breaking news — which may include content surrounding the war between Russia and Ukraine,” Iancu added. Our research found that 95 percent of parents talked to their children directly about Internet and social-media safety. But topics such as bot recognition and privacy, fake accounts, privacy, and what the differences are between real and online life were not discussed by nearly half of them.

A study revealed that 52 percent said they had not spoken with their children about issues like cyberbullying. In addition, one fifth of the parents caught their child posting to a “finsta”, or fake Instagram, account. A further 63 per cent of parents expressed concern that their children might be hurt while trying to duplicate the latest TikTok viral trend.

Inadequacy of Ratings

Similar to the controversy over ratings and video games, it could also be asked if parents still have a responsibility for monitoring what their kids are watching. There are not universal ratings available for content shared on social media, as there aren’t any like TV shows or movies.

Roger Entner, technology analyst for Recon Analytics stated that “Parents already have plenty of control to stop their children downloading apps to the smartphones,” and added that they had many other options. I don’t think there is any way the platforms could or should do anything unless they require positive identification when signing up.

YouTube is full of great education videos. However, YouTube is still not suitable for kids under 13 years old. The same is true of other platforms – yet many parents may not realize as much. It is even worse that some children might not realize the effort that goes into being a creator, or gamer.

Iancu warned that parents have been letting their children use platforms such as Instagram and YouTube before they turn 13. This is to help them become content creators or gamers. It’s crucial to be cautious when giving access online to children under 13 years old, given the behaviours that were uncovered by parents.

Social media posting is a part of the job for brand and product bloggers. Influencers need to take care of what they share. It is easy to create unneeded controversy in today’s highly politicized world. This can have a negative impact on one’s ability to influence others and bring in advertising dollars.

A poorly written post can get a lot more attention, but brands don’t want to be associated with someone who is not trending. Be sure to recognize influencers on social media.

It is social media by nature and users must expect others to see their accounts. Even if a person’s own immediate network isn’t upset by a post, users should think about how other people – such as their colleagues or clients – might react to it,” warned Colin Campbell, assistant professor of marketing at the Knauss School of Business at San Diego.

Even if an influencer is trying to make a statement on the most important issues, they shouldn’t get too political. Perhaps it’s best for both sides to be vocal about an issue. It is not To get involved. Otherwise, an influencer can become part of the story – and not in a good way.

Jui Ramaprasad, professor at the University of Maryland’s Robert H. Smith School of Business, stated that “In terms of being aware of social media posts (generally), it is crucial for us all to realize how the posts we make via social networks become our stories.”

The public personas they create are visible to all who view the comments. Ramaprasad added that it is impossible for readers to see the offline events or determine if views have developed unless those views are made public.

One concern is that if an influencer tries to grab onto a hot topic, it may appear more like someone who follows.

 “Authenticity in social media posts has been shown to be valued by consumers,” continued Ramaprasad. Ramaprasad said that society is changing and is finally acknowledging important issues such as racism, bias, and discrimination. – so indeed, when one’s authentic perspective includes such views as expressed by these reality stars, there will be some repercussions. This often results in being ‘cancelled’ by the public or – as these stars experience – cancelled by their employer.”

These Old Posts

Nothing shared on the Internet ever goes away – and there is always the chance that some post from years ago could come back to haunt an influencer. It’s often best to confront the problem directly.

“The safest approach is to acknowledge that it was a mistake and that the person – just like all of us – is growing and learning more over time,” said Campbell. Toxic actions such as deleting a post without explaining why are likely to cause outrage. The best approach is to apologize and acknowledge the error.

Celebrity influencers may find old photos suddenly making the rounds. While such issues are not permanent, it’s important to correct past errors.

Campbell added that “everyone can do it by going through older social media posts and reviewing them to determine if they no longer reflect who they are.”

It may be “social” media but those who make their business from it need to take it very seriously – for influencers it remains a business media.

Last week Cleveland Browns’ quarterback Baker Mayfield announced that he would be leaving social media for the foreseeable future – citing the toxic environment he had faced after a tumultuous season. Heisman Trophy winner Baker Mayfield, the Browns’ first overall pick in 2019 NFL Draft is the latest to abandon social media.

Today, it is all too common for athletes and celebrities to find themselves in the crosshairs from critics – and many times it can be extremely personal. All people feel this type of criticism, and even athletes.

Tom Kannon, DNP (PMHNP-BC), Assistant Dean of Online Graduate Nursing, Regis College Professor, explained that it impacts them just as much as anyone else.

Kannon warned that constant criticism could lead to negative self-talk and lowered self-esteem. It can also cause frustration, anger, and irritability. If this continues for too long, it can lead to anxiety and depression.

While very successful people tend to have good supports and coping mechanisms already established – and that can help bolster them against such negativity – if inundated with it long enough, it will erode even the strongest psyche.

Kannon said that criticism could lead to lower self-appreciation for some and higher self-defeating thoughts for others. For others it might be a catalyst for self-reflection and the ‘rise to the challenge’ of proving their critics wrong. How that happens depends in large measure on how the individual views themselves and their self-concept.

While many of us would like to think we aren’t concerned about what others think, that is often not the truth. It can be difficult to ignore negative remarks from athletes who are in the limelight.

Dr. Nathaniel N. Ivers is an associate professor at Wake Forest University and the chair of the Department of Counseling. He stated that “criticism” can have a negative impact on people’s mental and emotional health. It can lead to depression, anxiety and lower self-esteem. You may also experience increased emotional reactivity or isolation towards others. This can lead to a change in how you view others and a decrease in your ability to relate.

Social media makes it easier than ever for fans – and critics alike – to tear down athletes like never before. Baker Mayfield recognized the necessity to distance himself from the negative commentary that he was exposed to via social media platforms.

The Schadenfreude Effect

The biggest problem today is the ease with which individuals can be attacked on social media.

Ivers added that Schadenfreude, a psychological idea, suggests people are more likely to feel joy when they witness, learn about or participate in the troubles and failures of another person. Studies show that people with low self-esteem are more likely to feel joy at witnessing their humiliation and failures than those with higher self-esteem. Schadenfreude can explain some of the vitriolic comments that politicians and professional athletes face on the media and social media. Low self-esteem individuals are trying to boost their emotional equanimity and psychological stability by knocking down another person.

Although Schadenfreude is a common emotion in any relationship, it could be heightened by social media because of its ability to provide unprecedented access for high-profile individuals.

Ivers stated that it is crucial that individuals protect themselves against toxic environments that can degrade their self-worth and mental health. While it may be difficult for athletes and high-profile individuals to realize that others think negative about them, and they likely talk about them on social networks, the impact will be much less than if the person is consuming this negativity constantly and directly.

One Celebrity. A Brand

Where the issue becomes more complicated – especially for athletes – is that they are more than a person at times. A brand ambassador is what they do. Part of their income comes from the ability to promote products. It can be hard for athletes to leave social media platforms that are used to promote brands.

Melissa Davies, Ph.D. assistant professor of Sport Administration, Ohio University, stated that Baker Mayfield is an individual, with many rights, and also a professional athlete.

Davies said that Mayfield represents himself, his Browns brand and the NFL. He also endorses other companies. Each of these partnerships is confirmed by a contractual agreement that outlines the exact relationship and obligations between Mayfield’s organization and Mayfield. Mayfield needs to consider both his personal well-being, and the welfare of his family. Mayfield also has to weigh his earning potential as a public figure and the contractual arrangements.

Many brands pay huge sums for professional athletes to endorse their products through advertising on their social media and in print ads. Sometimes, these brands might allow athletes to appear on company social media. However, more frequently, the brand will pay celebrities or athletes for endorsements or advertisements on celebrity social media pages. This is called influencer marketing.

Davies stated that brands gain exposure to the targeted audience of athletes. While these deals can provide a lucrative way for athletes to earn additional income streams, engaging with social media through the NFL and Cleveland Browns is not an obligation. Mayfield appears to have weighed the potential earning on social media against the possibility of reducing tension in his private life, and decided to opt out.

Time Out – But Will It Help?

For Mayfield he may tune out of social media, but today it is impossible to escape what is said – likely even more than trying to avoid TV or the newspaper. In fact, news of Mayfield’s departure from social media has only cast him in the spotlight again – where articles such as this one now focus on the reasons. Even the people you may not agree with. It is notYou may have been following football for a while and suddenly realize the difficulties he had this season.

Still, departing social media could present some benefits for Mayfield – as well as others who are finding the platforms to be more negative than positive.

Kannon said that leaving social media could have a positive influence on an individual. Negative comments can be removed from your life, which will reduce stress. It’s similar to the old saying, “Out of sight, out mind.” One of the hardest things for elite athletes and high-profile people to do is to find a way to leave all the negative comments behind, since they will still more than likely still see it on TV, in newspapers/magazines, and the Internet in general not just social media.”

Mayfield can take a break on social media to avoid the negativity flood.

Kannon stated that although he might still be conscious of criticisms, the benefits would be double. The first is that criticisms would not be as visible. Second, criticisms published in magazines or news/TV programs would come with an identifiable source. It would make it easier for the individual to evaluate the validity of any comments.

Mannequin and self-made Instagram star Jay Alvarrez has been within the high 10 of many social media lists, together with for having probably the most followers, however in keeping with a brand new report from worldwide advertising and marketing company Sortlist, the Hawaiian-born social media sensation now tops a extra doubtful checklist. Alvarrez is the movie star with probably the most “pretend followers.”

Of his 6.8 million followers, upwards of two.45 million or 36 % are believed to be fakes.

Alvarrez might be in good or maybe unhealthy firm – as celebrities equivalent to Paris Hilton, Caitlyn Jenner and Nicki Minaji and types together with the Leicester Metropolis Soccer Membership, Pizza Hut and Burger King all had a sizeable variety of faker followers. Generally the bigger the variety of followers, the bigger variety of fakers – Arianna Grande had greater than 70 million pretend followers on Instagram in keeping with Sortlist, whereas even the British Royal household had almost two million!

The research famous that whereas it’s typically laborious for celebrities and types with such vital social media followings to restrict the variety of pretend followers they’ve, additionally it is an essential issue that manufacturers ought to take into accounts when working with and extra importantly paying an influencer.

If the influencer’s affect is not as nice as it could seem, it could make it more durable to show impressions into conversions.

“Having ‘pretend followers’ on social media may make an influencer or movie star look like they’ve extra affect or fame than they really do, particularly if you have a look at the size and proportion of faux followers on these platforms ” defined Aline Strouvens, digital public relations supervisor at Sortlist.

Whilst many of those influencers have an enormous variety of authentic followers, you will need to word that 100 million plus followers is lowered considerably if 26 % have been truly pretend customers. Even with an enormous following, it’s simple to see how this might inflate the notion of affect.

“For themselves this might be useful because it may mislead the general public into pondering they’re extra standard than they’re, which in flip may improve their likability,” Strouvens added. “There may be all the time a draw back – pretend followers and bots on social media are a problem as a result of they will trigger an issue with business worth and correct illustration.”

Social followings can grant an enormous financial worth to celebrities, manufacturers and influencers, and due to this, manufacturers trying to work with a selected influencer or movie star might make use of the highest social media groups and companies to work on their influencer advertising and marketing. If the numbers are artificially elevated that may end up in far much less precise affect.

“On our platform alone we noticed a 38 % improve in firms on the lookout for social media specialists – these groups will look into the credibility of your followings and engagement charges and use this as a deciding issue as as to if they may work or ‘collaborate’ with you,” Strouvens instructed me through an e-mail. “If an influencer or movie star has extraordinarily excessive quantities of faux followers and bots this might cut back their probabilities of getting extremely paid model collaborations and endorsements.”

Social media advertising and marketing is an experience that retains rising, and Sortlist mentioned it expects to maintain seeing increasingly specialists in influencer advertising and marketing. Nevertheless, these well-known people might want to decide find out how to finest handle the problems of faux followers in the event that they count on to take care of mentioned affect.

Strouvens added, “We will actually see on Sortlist the significance of this experience for firms and the way influencers and celebrities are going to should work on rising their credibility in an effort to achieve these high model collaborations.”

++ Click to Enlarge Image Chart++